3/24/11

Haliburton awarded oil drilling contacts in Southern China Sea, but by whom?

I don't usually post about corporate dealings but this press release caught my eye because the way it's worded, makes me ask questions.

Halliburton Awarded Contracts for First Ultra-HP/HT Oil and Gas Drilling Project in Asia

Halliburton (NYSE: HAL) has been awarded several contracts for the provision of equipment and services on two offshore blocks in the South China Sea. This is the first ultra-high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) oil and gas drilling project in Asia.

The exploration campaign calls for two firm wells and one potential well. Halliburton will provide directional drilling, measurement-while-drilling and logging-while-drilling (M/LWD) services; well completion equipment and services; surface well testing and downhole drillstem testing (DST) equipment and services; and cementing equipment, fluids and pumping services. Drilling is scheduled to start in the third quarter of 2011.
You can read the rest of the release here.

Three things I found interesting in this innocuous press release' wording:
  1. Haliburton was AWARDED the contracts
  2. The releases never mentions WHO awarded the contracts
  3. The drilling takes places in SOUTHERN CHINA SEA
Who do you think awarded these contracts to Dick Cheney's company to drill in China's seawaters? And why aren't they telling us?

3/21/11

Injustice

Injustice:
Whatever Gaddafi is doing to his people; or whatever Obama is doing to the American people (that is, starting another non-defensive military attack without consulting the will of the people who live in this ransacked country known as the United States of America).

Why didn'we do anything in Myanmar
or Sudan, Darfur?
Let's see
maybe it's because Libya's got shit tons of Petroleum reserves
but those aforementioned countries are stuck in poor geographical locations who have been victims of colonialist abuse for ages, that the western countries today simply don't give a fuck. Let those savages die in their desert and their jungles, say the leaders of the G7.

2/28/11

A romantic traditionalist's view on today's photojournalism

Here is an article by a Russian photojournalist, whom I have never heard of before, that is his views on today's 'winning' photojournalism. His lamentations and critique sum up quite well how I feel about much of today's popular photojournalism as well (including, but limited to, the over usage of a Canon 5D and 24mm 1.4 wide angle lens).

Obviously our Russian man here is a lover of art, and he speaks like Tolstoy in his authoritative, and bemoaning tone. This is purely an article of emotions, not of facts. You should not try to debate with him on photography. Either you agree with him, or you don't. I agree with him.

Some memorable lines
The unifying theme [of winning World Press Photo] is the monotony of photographic forms, most of which are in a style of unconscious naivety and primitivism, series without beginning or end, lacking any generalization and categorizing but with a focus on exotic images from distant third world countries untouched by 21st century civilisation...Classic culture and art have been replaced by tawdry mystifications, exotic rites and vacation photos.


2/10/11

The end of Nostalgia

Childhood is only beautiful for those adults who can't remember.  
--Francois Truffaut

Ever since the first time I went back to Beijing in 2003, I have my head wrapped in a never ending stream of nostalgic inflections. The things I was most nostalgic for were: Hutongs, Slow Beijing buses, Empty Subways, Oddly placed, but landmark buildings that served as knowledge bank for my childhood's many curiosities.  At least, these were the things I thought I was nostalgic for, and as a result, I took many pictures of them when I visited China.  At a well known Art School interview, I event professed that my main interest was in "Culture in Transition."  Meaning an old country shedding its old architecture and culture to be absorbed into a profit-driven, capitalist culture with a plethora of shiny buildings and cars that replace the traditional, undeveloped methods of living and moving around. 

However, this time when I was in Beijing, I found myself no longer enchanted by the objects and places driven by nostalgia.  I still went to the first apartment my family lived in, walked around the streets that my parents used to bike me through in the 80s, and snapped pictures of brick walls and blankets hanging on strings, as such.  But the pictures came out crappy, and from them I could only see a reflection of my personal disinterest, in these so-called 'nostalgic' locales.  The bare fact as it surfaces now, is that I no longer have any interest in the Beijing of my childhood.  I was not in love with the city when I lived there, I only began to love it when I left, after I had gained a comparative knowledge of urban and suburban life. 

Beijing is an old city becoming very new due to the people who have moved there and the buildings that have sprouted up.  Life in old Beijing was cramped, dirty, moist with human waste.  Life in new Beijing is cramped, sweaty, dusty, but if you can afford it, a nice secluded, high-rise apartment that offers tranquility not before possible.  In essence, Beijing is more Western now, and it has matured to a point that one can enjoy a Western-style living in Beijing without experiencing any clumsiness customary in the painful transition from a third-world to a first-world.  All that happened while I was gong and in the first half of last decade (hence the last two times I visited I deeply craved a nostalgic Beijing). Of course this is not to say all of the city enjoys this convenient, comfortable and protected Western style of life, but I can unashamedly say that I enjoyed it, and this is how I intend to live if I do move back to Beijing.

The effervescent world that exists at the end of a person's nostalgic vision, is it really paradise?  Or is it just a mis-colored blotch of what we call 'unsophisticated youth' where the adult, mature thinker substitutes the memories of his youthful ignorance with more pleasing, but also more theoretical terms such as 'innocence,' 'simplicity,' 'spirituality,' and the worst of all, 'purity?' 

I am not an expert on purity and I dare not claim so because there is something impure in everything I do. As progressive as I am I take a lot of the privileges of a developed world for granted and indulge in its excesses.  Maybe this is why my father's life seems happy, because he is doing the exact same.  There is no need to hold back on one's enjoyment of life's pleasures if one's economic situations allow for a status upgrade.  Beijing has become a city where if you have money, you can live a wonderful life, and if you don't have money, life is not very different from fifteen years ago.  There is no need to be 'nostalgic' when one is in Beijing. That is only non-existent for the rich who have allowed themselves to live accordingly to their wealth, or for those who use 'nostalgia' as an excuse for their failures to ride the changes to get ahead.   

Nostalgia is easy to summon when the person is not burdened by the actualities of the imagined, nostalgic past.